DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mitsubishi Town BOX vs 2015 Opel Adam Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Town BOX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
Town BOXModelAdam
2011Model year2015
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement999 cc
48 HPPower90 HP
62 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
165/65 R13Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3698 mm
1475 mmWidth1720 mm
1890 mmHeight1484 mm
880 KgWeight1081 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2311 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mitsubishi Town BOX and 2015 Opel Adam approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Town BOX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…