1995 • Mitsubishi
Toppo
Mitsubishi Toppo 1995Overall Score51.5/100
1995 Mitsubishi Toppo vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi ToppoSpecificationMazda Scrum
MitsubishiMakeMazda
ToppoModelScrum
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi ToppoSpecificationMazda Scrum
0 km/hTop speed125 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
40 HPPower42 HP
51 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi ToppoSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi ToppoSpecificationMazda Scrum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/80 R12 STyre size145/80 R12 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi ToppoSpecificationMazda Scrum
3295 mmLength3295 mm
1395 mmWidth1395 mm
1765 mmHeight1870 mm
670 KgWeight780 Kg
2260 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Mitsubishi Toppo and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…