1996 • Mitsubishi
Space Wagon
Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2.0 TD GLX (N38W) 1996Overall Score54.5/100
1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs 1996 Ford Escort Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.9i (88 Hp) 1996Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Ford Escort
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi Space WagonSpecificationFord Escort
MitsubishiMakeFord
Space WagonModelEscort
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi Space WagonSpecificationFord Escort
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1859 cc
82 HPPower88 HP
172 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi Space WagonSpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi Space WagonSpecificationFord Escort
—Length4317 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1334 mm
—Weight1045 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon and 1996 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSToyota Corona vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon1996 and 1996 model years
VSProton Persona vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon1996 and 1996 model yearsVSFord Escort vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon1996 and 1996 model years
VSMercury Tracer vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon1996 and 1996 model years
VSSeat Ibiza vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon1996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…