DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Star

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
Space StarModelMegane
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
112 HPPower107 HP
157 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4082 mm
1715 mmWidth1698 mm
1515 mmHeight1368 mm
1235 KgWeight1125 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Star leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…