DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2004 Fiat Stilo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Stilo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
Space StarModelStilo
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower103 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4180 mm
1715 mmWidth1785 mm
1515 mmHeight1475 mm
1235 KgWeight1150 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2004 Fiat Stilo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Stilo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…