DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2003 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
Space StarModelS40
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
98 HPPower109 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/55R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4516 mm
1715 mmWidth1716 mm
1515 mmHeight1422 mm
1235 KgWeight1255 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2003 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…