DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2002 Kia Sephia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sephia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
Space StarModelSephia
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1594 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
150 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4510 mm
1715 mmWidth1720 mm
1515 mmHeight1415 mm
1235 KgWeight1095 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2002 Kia Sephia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sephia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…