DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2002 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
Space StarModelFocus
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
150 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4152 mm
1715 mmWidth1698 mm
1515 mmHeight1430 mm
1235 KgWeight1070 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2002 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…