DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2014 Kia Rio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Star

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
Space StarModelRio
2014Model year2014
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h16,1 s
172 km/hTop speed160 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1120 cc
71 HPPower75 HP
88 NmTorque170 Nm
—Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank43 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3710 mmLength4045 mm
1665 mmWidth1720 mm
1490 mmHeight1455 mm
—Weight1116 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2014 Kia Rio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Star leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…