DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 2002 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
Space RunnerModelL 200
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
150 HPPower132 HP
225 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4500 mm
1695 mmWidth1655 mm
1650 mmHeight1570 mm
1400 KgWeight1660 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 2002 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…