DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1999 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
Space RunnerModelBora
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
155 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
82 HPPower68 HP
172 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4376 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1665 mmHeight1446 mm
1260 KgWeight1265 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1999 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…