DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1998 Tofas Kartal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Kartal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeTofas
Space RunnerModelKartal
1998Model year1998
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h13,9 s
155 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1585 cc
82 HPPower81 HP
172 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4361 mm
1695 mmWidth1642 mm
1665 mmHeight1496 mm
1260 KgWeight1060 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1998 Tofas Kartal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Kartal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…