DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1994 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
Space RunnerModelMondeo
1994Model year1994
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
155 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
82 HPPower88 HP
172 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4487 mm
1695 mmWidth1749 mm
1665 mmHeight1424 mm
1260 KgWeight1260 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1994 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…