DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 2000 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChrysler
Space RunnerModelVoyager
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
185 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
133 HPPower133 HP
176 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank76 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4733 mm
1695 mmWidth1950 mm
1665 mmHeight1740 mm
1210 KgWeight1705 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 2000 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…