DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
Space RunnerModelSpace Runner
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
178 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4290 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1650 mmHeight1650 mm
1300 KgWeight1300 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…