DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHonda
Space RunnerModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
178 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4290 mmLength3950 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1650 mmHeight1750 mm
1300 KgWeight1330 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…