DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1998 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHonda
Space RunnerModelSm-x
1998Model year1998
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
122 HPPower131 HP
161 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,93 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4290 mmLength3950 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1640 mmHeight1750 mm
1228 KgWeight1330 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1998 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…