DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
Space RunnerModel80
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
180 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
122 HPPower90 HP
161 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4482 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1640 mmHeight1406 mm
1228 KgWeight1270 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…