DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlfa Romeo
Space RunnerModel146
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
175 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1712 cc
122 HPPower129 HP
161 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4257 mm
1695 mmWidth1712 mm
1680 mmHeight1425 mm
1315 KgWeight1225 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…