DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1994 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
Space RunnerModelGolf
1994Model year1994
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
122 HPPower90 HP
161 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4020 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1680 mmHeight1425 mm
1315 KgWeight1195 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1994 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…