DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1993 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
Space RunnerModelCroma
1992Model year1993
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
122 HPPower94 HP
161 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption6 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1680 mmHeight1430 mm
1315 KgWeight1240 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1993 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…