DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Space Gear vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

44.5–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
Space GearModelSpace Runner
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
149 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
99 HPPower82 HP
240 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4655 mmLength4270 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1855 mmHeight1665 mm
1685 KgWeight1260 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Space Gear and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…