DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Space Gear vs 1997 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

44.5–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGAZ
Space GearModel31
1996Model year1997
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
149 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
99 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/80 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4655 mmLength4960 mm
1695 mmWidth1800 mm
1855 mmHeight1422 mm
1685 KgWeight1450 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Space Gear and 1997 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…