DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Space Gear vs 2002 Great Wall Safe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Safe

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGreat Wall
Space GearModelSafe
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

139 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
99 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank0 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/80 R15 STyre size235/75 R15

Dimensions

4655 mmLength4860 mm
1695 mmWidth—
1965 mmHeight1820 mm
1860 KgWeight1640 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Space Gear and 2002 Great Wall Safe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Safe leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…