DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Gear vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
Space GearModelXM
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,1 s
139 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
99 HPPower129 HP
240 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
14 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/80 R15 STyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4655 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1965 mmHeight1394 mm
1860 KgWeight1564 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Gear and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…