DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Gear vs 2000 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.25–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeDaewoo
Space GearModelRezzo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
160 km/hTop speed111 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower121 HP
165 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4655 mmLength4350 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1855 mmHeight1580 mm
1620 KgWeight1392 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Gear and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…