DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Sigma vs 1997 Toyota Sienna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Sienna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
SigmaModelSienna
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
205 HPPower197 HP
270 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4910 mm
1775 mmWidth1860 mm
1435 mmHeight1710 mm
1579 KgWeight1705 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1997 Toyota Sienna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Sienna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…