DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi Sigma vs 1994 Plymouth Acclaim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Plymouth Acclaim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakePlymouth
SigmaModelAcclaim
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
177 HPPower143 HP
251 NmTorque232 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4600 mm
1775 mmWidth1730 mm
1435 mmHeight1360 mm
1468 KgWeight1350 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1994 Plymouth Acclaim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Plymouth Acclaim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…