DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs 1992 Mercury Topaz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Topaz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMercury
SigmaModelTopaz
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
177 HPPower137 HP
251 NmTorque204 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4490 mm
1775 mmWidth1735 mm
1435 mmHeight1340 mm
1468 KgWeight1185 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1992 Mercury Topaz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Topaz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…