DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs 2006 Pontiac Torrent Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Torrent

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakePontiac
RaiderModelTorrent
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
210 HPPower186 HP
235 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears—
—Tyre size235/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5585 mmLength4795 mm
1826 mmWidth1814 mm
1742 mmHeight1703 mm
—Weight1740 Kg
3335 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Raider and 2006 Pontiac Torrent approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Torrent leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…