DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2013 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
PajeroModelCX-9
2011Model year2013
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
250 HPPower273 HP
329 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
88 ltFuel tank76 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/65 R17Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1875 mmWidth1935 mm
1870 mmHeight1727 mm
2035 KgWeight1964 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2013 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…