DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2012 Ford Edge Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Edge

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
PajeroModelEdge
2011Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
200 km/hTop speed179 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3721 cc
250 HPPower305 HP
329 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
88 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/65 R17Tyre size235/65 R17; 245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4679 mm
1875 mmWidth1930 mm
1870 mmHeight1702 mm
2035 KgWeight—
2780 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2012 Ford Edge approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Edge leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…