DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2000 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
PajeroModelCaprice
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
208 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
92 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
14,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R15 HTyre size225/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4725 mmLength5237 mm
1785 mmWidth1847 mm
1895 mmHeight1459 mm
2085 KgWeight1690 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2000 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…