DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2013 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeJaguar
PajeroModelXF
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
180 km/hTop speed237 km/h
3200 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
197 HPPower238 HP
441 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank64 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4961 mm
1875 mmWidth1877 mm
1870 mmHeight1460 mm
2095 KgWeight1690 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2013 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…