DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Audi A6 vs 2017 Isuzu Mu Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationIsuzu Mu
AudiMakeIsuzu
A6ModelMu
2014Model year2017
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationIsuzu Mu
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
242 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2773 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
204 HPPower177 HP
280 NmTorque430 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationIsuzu Mu
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationIsuzu Mu
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/60 R16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationIsuzu Mu
4926 mmLength4825 mm
1874 mmWidth1860 mm
1468 mmHeight1825 mm
1570 KgWeight2072 Kg
2912 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Audi A6 and 2017 Isuzu Mu approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…