DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi A6 vs 2004 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeNissan
A6ModelCedric
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
248 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2671 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
250 HPPower280 HP
350 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption18 lt
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
11,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
215/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4796 mmLength4860 mm
1810 mmWidth1770 mm
1453 mmHeight1450 mm
1660 KgWeight1660 Kg
2759 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi A6 and 2004 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…