DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 1997 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
PajeroModelCampo
2000Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,3 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
150 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2835 ccEngine displacement3059 cc
125 HPPower109 HP
292 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
92 ltFuel tank0 lt
15,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,3 ltAverage consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15 RTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4980 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1855 mmHeight1710 mm
2129 KgWeight—
2725 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero and 1997 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…