DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2004 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

45.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
PajeroModelCedric
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
145 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
99 HPPower85 HP
240 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / LPG
74 ltFuel tank0 lt
11 ltUrban consumption12 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4690 mm
1775 mmWidth1695 mm
1735 mmHeight1445 mm
1970 KgWeight1480 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2004 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…