DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2009 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.5–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGreat Wall
PajeroModelHover CUV
2004Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h28,0 s
145 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
99 HPPower95 HP
240 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank74 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70R15Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4620 mm
1775 mmWidth1800 mm
1735 mmHeight1775 mm
1970 KgWeight1840 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2009 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…