DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2009 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
OutlanderModelXC60
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
232 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/55 R18Tyre size235/65 R17; 235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4628 mm
1800 mmWidth1891 mm
1720 mmHeight1713 mm
1665 KgWeight1798 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2009 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…