DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2006 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
OutlanderModelXC90
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
232 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/55 R18Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4800 mm
1800 mmWidth1890 mm
1720 mmHeight1740 mm
1665 KgWeight2095 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2006 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…