DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2016 Chevrolet Equinox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Equinox

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChevrolet
OutlanderModelEquinox
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
150 HPPower184 HP
380 NmTorque233 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank71 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size225/65 R17; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4770 mm
1810 mmWidth1841 mm
1680 mmHeight1684 mm
1600 KgWeight1707 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2016 Chevrolet Equinox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Equinox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…