2000 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.7 T V6 (230 Hp) 2000Overall Score75.75/100
2000 Audi A6 vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
WINNER
Audi A6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A6SpecificationNissan Cedric
AudiMakeNissan
A6ModelCedric
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi A6SpecificationNissan Cedric
7,1 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
245 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2671 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
230 HPPower260 HP
310 NmTorque324 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A6SpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,6 ltAverage consumption12,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi A6SpecificationNissan Cedric
4796 mmLength4860 mm
1810 mmWidth1770 mm
1451 mmHeight1465 mm
1635 KgWeight1710 Kg
2759 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Audi A6 and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…