DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2009 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSeat
OutlanderModelToledo
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
310 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4458 mm
1800 mmWidth1768 mm
1720 mmHeight1568 mm
1665 KgWeight1399 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2009 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…