DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Montero vs 2005 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Caprice

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
MonteroModelCaprice
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
250 HPPower233 HP
329 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
88 ltFuel tank75 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/65 R17Tyre size225/55 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength5237 mm
1875 mmWidth1847 mm
1870 mmHeight1459 mm
2215 KgWeight1722 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Montero and 2005 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Caprice leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…