DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs 1998 Eagle Vision Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Montero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeEagle
MonteroModelVision
2000Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
203 HPPower218 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
92 ltFuel tank68 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R16Tyre size225/60 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4725 mmLength5120 mm
1775 mmWidth1890 mm
1900 mmHeight1417 mm
1955 KgWeight1582 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Montero and 1998 Eagle Vision approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Montero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…