DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Montero vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Montero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
MonteroModelXC90
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
202 HPPower243 HP
318 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/70 R16 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4795 mmLength4807 mm
1875 mmWidth1936 mm
1855 mmHeight1784 mm
2135 KgWeight2218 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Montero and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Montero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…