DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Montero vs 1996 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
MonteroModel940
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
151 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2316 cc
133 HPPower131 HP
280 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4871 mm
1775 mmWidth1750 mm
1735 mmHeight1425 mm
1830 KgWeight1360 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Montero and 1996 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…