DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs 2000 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Terrano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
MonteroModelTerrano
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
150 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
115 HPPower116 HP
240 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4185 mm
1775 mmWidth1755 mm
1735 mmHeight1830 mm
1920 KgWeight1630 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Montero and 2000 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Terrano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…