DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Mirage vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Mirage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
MirageModelPolo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
165 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1468 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
137 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
165 S R13Tyre size195/45 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3870 mmLength3743 mm
1680 mmWidth1632 mm
1375 mmHeight1418 mm
1080 KgWeight1010 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2407 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Mirage and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Mirage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…